Brain Damage Detected in Children with Attention Deficit Disorder and Learning Disabilities
Information Compiled by Richard W. Pressinger, M.Ed.
University of South Florida Graduate Student Research Project - Special Education Department Environmental Causes of Learning Disabilities and Attention Deficit Disorder
There has been a growing amount of medical research identifying various types of brain damage in children with attention deficit disorder, hyperactivity and learning disabilities. The nationwide increases being observed in many scientists are explaining these child disorders as resulting from environmental and chemical exposures during pregnancy.
These include the obvious culprits such as alcohol and cigarette use, but serious new concerns are being raised by government and university research showing many common household chemicals are also being found to damage brain development during pregnancy.
These include cleaning chemicals, home pesticide use, cosmetic chemicals (such as nail polish and perfume), prescription medications, artificial food additives, chemicals in plastics, synthetic perfume and cologne ingredients, job chemicals, and the pesticide chlordane (found as a contaminant in the air of most U.S. homes built before 1988) .
In a summary report entitled the Principles of Developmental Neurotoxicity, from the National Center for Toxicological Research (7), it was stated:
"According to the Congressional Office of Technology Assessments recent report on neurotoxicity, among the known or suspected causes of brain-related disorders are exposure to chemicals including pesticides, therapeutic drugs, food additives, foods, cosmetic ingredients and naturally occurring substances"
If we are to agree with this research that repeated exposure to certain consumer chemicals can weaken or damage brain growth and result in increases in mental retardation, learning disabilities or behavior disorders, then it is quite plausible to expect a corresponding subtle decrease in mental function of our above average students, but detecting such effects will be extremely difficult.
Also, it is important to realize that a decrease in mental capacity is not strictly limited to academic function. The human brain is also responsible for all other mental functions including talent, personality, sense of humor, articulation skills and even conscience oriented behavior.
Therefore, it is quite realistic to suspect the potential for these areas of the human brain to be compromised by the same compounds being found to cause learning disabilities and attention deficit disorder.
Many researchers now agree, as will be addressed in this paper, that subtle brain disorders can be the cause of learning disabilities, hyperactivity, attention deficits and even propensity toward behavior problems such as aggression and behavior "void of conscience." In fact, it has been only recently that abnormalities in brain structure have been found in people with learning disabilities and attention deficit disorders.
Brain Damage Found in Students with Learning Disabilities and Attention Deficit Disorder.
Examples of visually detected brain damage in learning disability and attention deficit individuals are discussed in three different research projects below. One incident reported by Dr. Albert Galaburda at Harvard Medical School, investigated the unfortunate accidental death of an individual with known serious reading learning disabilities in school. At age 18 he had a reading level of fourth grade despite a 105 intelligence score on the Stanford- Binet test. Because of this discrepancy in intelligence and reading level, he was given the diagnosis of Developmental Dyslexia. He also had moderate math difficulties and mild difficulties with right-left orientation and finger recognition.
At age 20, six days after beginning his first paying job, the patient died suddenly as the result of an accidental fall from a great height. The cause of death was multiple internal injuries producing massive bleeding. An autopsy of the brain showed no evidence of trauma or other gross abnormalities according to the researchers. After receiving permission from the mans parents, the physicians conducted a thorough examination of the mans brain structure. The researchers stated the area of the learning disability brain shows abnormalities also to a location in the brain called the "Wernickes Speech Area," and appears to play a particularly important role in language function.
The researchers concluded by saying,
"The findings reported here lend support to the notion that language-relevant areas in the brains of patients with developmental dyslexia (a type of learning disability) may be small in the two cerebral hemispheres, a possibility which is also supported by findings of curtailed linguistic processing by both hemispheres in dyslexic patients."
Learning Disability & Attention Deficit Children Have Lower Blood Flow in Some Brain Areas
Department of Neurology, Kennedy Institute in Denmark
A method for determining abnormalities in the brains of living learning disability (LD) and attention deficit disorder (ADD) children was used in a study of 13 LD and ADD children at the Department of Neurology, Kennedy Institute in Denmark.
The study was conducted using a method called emission computed tomography which takes a picture of a "slice" of the brain after the child inhales a very small amount of a radioactive substance called xenon 133. The picture then allows the scientists to visually see how much blood is being used by different parts of the brain (a greater illumination in the picture represents increased blood flow). This also represents the level of metabolic activity in the brain areas. After comparing the photographs taken of all children the investigators stated,
"The cerebral blood flow distribution was abnormal in both hemispheres (both sides of the brains) in all patients, as compared with the mean cerebral blood flow distribution of nine normal children.... All 11 patients with attention deficit disorder (ADD) have hypoperfusion (low blood flow) in the mesial frontal lobes, in particular in the white matter.... Methylphenidate hydrochloride (Ritalin) increased perfusion (blood flow) in the central region, including the mesencephalon and the basal ganglia, and decreased perfusion of motor and primary sensory cortical areas.... Hypoperfusion and low metabolic activity may be due to subtle morphologic abnormalities not detectable with computed tomography but with important pathogenetic implications."
To bring this into perspective and without the multi-syllable medical terms, the investigators found lower levels of blood in Attention Deficit Disorder children in the area of the brain that is just behind the central forehead going in about an inch or two. When ritalin was given and measurements taken again, normal blood flow was created, thereby providing a biological explanation of why children improve after taking Ritalin.
Glucose Metabolism Defective in Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder Syndrome
In a study of hyperactive students conducted at the National Institute of Mental Health, reported in the November 15, 1990 New England Journal of Medicine, researchers found the brain cells of these individuals were using lower levels of glucose than other non-hyperactive people (glucose is the primary fuel used by the brain cells which enables them to function).
In a study of hyperactive students conducted at the National Institute of Mental Health, reported in the November 15, 1990 New England Journal of Medicine, researchers found the brain cells of these individuals were using lower levels of glucose than other non-hyperactive people (glucose is the primary fuel used by the brain cells which enables them to function).
In conclusion, the investigators stated:
"Glucose metabolism, both global and regional, was reduced in adults who had been hyperactive since childhood. The largest reductions were in the pre-motor cortex and the superior prefrontal cortex - areas earlier shown to be involved in the control of attention and motor activity."
Since there is common agreement among researchers and medical professionals that learning disabilities and attention deficits can, in fact, result from subtle brain damage caused by a variety of common environmental chemical exposures in today's "modern" society, it is imperative to organize this information into an easy to read format. This will give couples who desire to have children a far better chance of having a child that is neurologically healthy without the complications accompanied by attention deficit disorder or learning disabilities. This has been the goal of this research project.
An Interesting Observation from an Older Medical Journal
In the 1975 Canadian Psychiatric Association Journal, Dr. R. Denson discusses the increase society has observed in children with hyperactive disorders.
"The hyperkinetic syndrome is often encountered at the present time, although the textbooks of thirty years ago make scant reference to it. Henderson and Gillespie characterized hyperkinetic disease as one of the "very rare" psychoses of childhood, and Kanner, who devoted only five sentences to "the restless, fidgety, hyperkinetic child", omitted hyperactivity altogether when discussing the causes of scholastic problems.
Recent estimates imply that persistent, disruptive hyperactivity occurs in from five to ten percent of North American elementary school children and Wender who depicts hyperactivity as "the single most common behavioral disorder seen by child psychiatrists", has calculated that there are approximately five million hyperactive children in the United States, where more than 150,000 youngsters are receiving treatment with stimulant drugs for hyperkinesis and similar disorders."
For more information on the chemicals and job exposures being found to cause Attention Deficit Disorder, Attention Deficit Hyperactive Disorder, and Learning Disabilities, please visit www.chem-tox.com/pregnancy/learning_disabilities.htm
Food Allergies
Janet Zand L.Ac., O.M.D.
(Excerpted from Smart Medicine for a Healthier Child)
An allergy is a hypersensitive reaction to a normally harmless substance. About one in every six children in the United States is allergic to one or more substances. There are a variety of substances, termed allergens, that may trouble your child. Common allergens include pollen, animal dander, house dust, feathers, mites, chemicals, and a variety of foods. This section is devoted to food-related allergies.
Allergic reactions can occur immediately, or they can be delayed and take days to surface. A delayed allergic reaction can make it more difficult to pinpoint the allergen.
Common symptoms of an allergic reaction are respiratory congestion, eye inflammation, swelling, itching, hives, and stomachache and vomiting. Food allergies can contribute to chronic health problems, such as acne, asthma, bedwetting, diarrhea, ear infections, eczema, fatigue, hay fever, headache, irritability, chronic runny nose, and even difficulty maintaining concentration (attention deficit disorder, or hyperactivity). Food allergies can also cause intestinal irritation and swelling that interferes with the absorption of vitamins and minerals. Even if you are providing your child with a wholesome, nutritious diet, if she is consuming foods to which she is allergic, she may not be able to absorb food properly, and therefore may not be deriving the full benefits of all the foods she is eating.
The most common foods that cause allergic reactions in children are wheat, milk and other dairy products, eggs, fish and seafood, chocolate, citrus fruits, soy products, corn, nuts, and berries. Many children also are allergic to sulfites, which are found in some frozen foods and dried fruits, as well as in medications. Some people seem to be genetically predisposed to food allergies. If family members, especially parents, have food allergies, there is a greater chance a child will have the same difficulties.
Sometimes, if all the irritating foods are eliminated from a child's diet for several months, her body will have a chance to rest and heal, after which it will be able to handle small amounts of these foods without reacting. Sometimes, too, there is an underlying issue such as a parasitic or yeast infection in the intestine that is contributing to the allergic response. If these underlying problems are cleared up, the child's body may be less reactive to certain substances.
It has been observed that some children actively dislike the foods that produce an allergic reaction. They seem to know instinctively that certain foods will cause a problem. If your child continually refuses particular foods, it may be wise not to force the issue.
Paradoxically, however, some children seem to be particularly drawn to the very foods that cause a problem. For example, many children are allergic to peanut butter, a staple in many homes. Children who continually ask for peanut butter, or those who enthusiastically eat lots of wheat bread, wheat crackers, and wheat cereals, or who crave milk, ice cream, and other dairy products, may actually be exhibiting an allergy to those foods.
EMERGENCY TREATMENT FOR FOOD ALLERGIES
Occasionally, an allergic reaction is so severe it can be life threatening. If your child exhibits rapidly spreading hives or has difficulty breathing, seek medical attention immediately.
If there is any sign that your child is having difficulty breathing due to a severe allergic reaction, especially if she has a history of severe reactions, take her immediately to the emergency room of the nearest hospital. If you cannot transport your child yourself, call for emergency help and stress the urgency of the situation. Every second counts.
If an emergency adrenaline kit, such as the Ana~it or EpiPen, is available, administer it immediately, followed by 50 milligrams of an antihistamine such as Benadryl. Do not give your child anything to eat or drink if she is having difficulty breathing. Even if your child responds quickly to the administration of the emergency adrenaline kit, she should still be taken to the emergency room for professional evaluation and treatment.
Conventional Treatment
The most important part of treating food allergies, obviously, is to identify- and then avoid-the foods that are causing your child's reaction. There are two techniques, the elimination diet and the rotation diet, that enable you to do this. Once you have identified the foods or classes of foods that cause symptoms in your child, remember to read the labels on all the processed food products you buy. Many food products will contain one or more of the substances you have identified as the source of your child's allergy.
In cases of severe multiple food allergies, oral cromolyn sodium (Gastrocrom) may be prescribed as a preventive measure. This is the same drug that is used in inhaled form to prevent asthma attacks.
If your child suffers from recurrent allergic reactions, an antihistamine may be recommended.
Dietary Guidelines
Use an elimination diet to determine which foods are causing your child's symptoms. Some of the foods that most commonly cause a reaction are dairy products, wheat, citrus fruits, nuts (including peanut butter), corn, soy products, cane sugar, and eggs. You may wish to try eliminating these first.
Always read product labels and be aware of the ingredients in manufactured food products, especially additives such as artificial flavorings and colorings. Processed foods often contain a surprising array of ingredients and additives. It's better to base your child's diet on whole foods that you prepare yourself.
Nutritional Supplements
For age-appropriate dosages of nutritional supplements, see Dosage Guidelines for Herbs and Nutritional Supplements.
Calcium and magnesium help to reduce sensitivity and nervousness associated with allergies. Give your child a combination liquid containing 250 milligrams of calcium and 125 milligrams of magnesium, twice a day, for two to three months.
Give your child 50 to 100 milligrams of pantothenic acid, twice daily, at least one hour away from food, for one month to support adrenal function.
The B vitamins help support adrenal function. Give your child a vitamin-B complex supplement, twice a day, for two to three months.
Vitamin C helps to stimulate immune function. Give your child one dose of vitamin C, in mineral ascorbate form with bioflavonoids, twice a day, for two to three months.
General Recommendations
Use an elimination or rotation diet to identify the food or foods that are causing your child's allergic response.
Because allergic reactions can take a wide variety of forms, from headaches to bedwetting, you may want to consult other entries in this book that correspond to your child's symptoms.
Prevention
There is no way to prevent your child from developing a food allergy. It goes without saying, however, that you should make sure she is not exposed to any known allergens.
Cycled Light Promotes Growth in Pre-Term Infants, Duke University Study Finds
DURHAM, N.C., Feb. 21 (AScribe Newswire) -- A Duke University Medical Center study has shown that exposing babies born before 31 weeks of gestation to cycled light helps them grow faster, and the study identifies no short-term advantages to keeping infants in total near darkness -- the standard practice with many infants.
According to the nurse researchers, by growing faster such pre-term infants can leave the hospital sooner and may have improved developmental outcomes. The study is published in the February 2002 issue of the Journal of Pediatrics.
Approximately 10 percent of all pregnancies in the United States result in pre-term births. A baby is considered pre-term if born before 37 weeks gestation. A full-term pregnancy is 37 to 40 weeks gestation.
Pre-term deliveries are costly both financially and emotionally for families, and the infants are at risk for multiple health and developmental problems. By creating an environment that may encourage growth, the Duke research suggests, these pre-term complications may be reduced.
"Additional research will be needed to show the long-term impact of a cycled light environment in these babies, but this research clearly shows that cycled light improves growth rates in pre-term babies, and that's a step in the right direction," said Debra Brandon, Ph.D., R.N., principal investigator and associate professor in the Duke School of Nursing.
Currently, many neonatal intensive care units keep babies in near darkness to simulate the mother's womb. Constant bright light has been shown to be too stressful on pre-term infants, causing irregular heart rates and decreased sleep. However, until the Duke study, no research has examined the benefits of cycled light versus near darkness.
"Cycled light establishes a day/night rhythm, mimicking the circadian rhythm cues that are established for full-term babies in the womb," said Brandon. "We know adults rely on circadian rhythms for health, growth and development, and pre-term babies grow within a rich circadian environment provided by the mother. Therefore it is likely that a circadian environment is important for pre-term infants. Light is one method that we can use to promote circadian rhythms for these infants and encourage growth and healthy sleep patterns."
Researchers from the schools of nursing at both Duke and the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC-CH) examined the effects of cycled light on 62 infants born before 31 weeks gestation at Duke University Hospital and Durham Regional Hospital. Infants with neurologic or visual problems were excluded from the study.
The babies were assigned randomly to three groups: cycled light from birth, cycled light once they reached 32 weeks postconceptual age (equivalent to gestational age if the baby had not been born pre-term) and cycled light at 36 weeks postconceptual age. Infants in all three groups were similar with respect to degree of prematurity and birth weight.
The babies were weighed daily. Infants who received cycled light from birth and cycled light at 32 weeks postconceptual age grew more rapidly than the babies who received cycled light just before discharge.
"Now that we know that cycled light does encourage growth in the short term, we need to also follow these babies for long-term impact," said Brandon. "In two to five years, will we see that these babies have continued to grow well? Will they have developed sleep patterns earlier and have better language and cognitive development? We need to know the answers to these questions."
The National Institute of Nursing Research, a division of the National Institutes of Health, funded the research.
Co-authors on the paper include Diane Holditch, Ph.D., R.N., and Michael Belyea, Ph.D., of UNC-CH School of Nursing.
|